Comments on: FluidHTML – Markup for Flash- What does it mean for HTML guys? http://microreviews.org/fluidhtml-markup-for-flash/ Fri, 18 Nov 2011 12:08:00 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1 By: ArchieIndian http://microreviews.org/fluidhtml-markup-for-flash/#comment-928 ArchieIndian Thu, 17 Sep 2009 13:27:00 +0000 http://microreviews.org/?p=1075#comment-928 Yes a very basic difference is there . Interpreter will go line by line and atleast show the stuff upto which you are correct. In case of compiler if there is an error, you get an error page and nothing else. <br /> I found a good difference at <a href="http://forums.techarena.in/software-development/1120767.htm" target="_blank"><a href="http://forums.techarena.in/software-development/1120767.htm</a>" target="_blank"><a href="http://forums.techarena.in/software-development/1...</a></a>" target="_blank">http://forums.techarena.in/software-development/1...</a></a></a> Yes a very basic difference is there . Interpreter will go line by line and atleast show the stuff upto which you are correct. In case of compiler if there is an error, you get an error page and nothing else. <br />
I found a good difference at <a href="http://forums.techarena.in/software-development/1120767.htm&quot; target="_blank"><a href="http://forums.techarena.in/software-development/1120767.htm</a>&quot; target="_blank"><a href="http://forums.techarena.in/software-development/1…</a></a>&quot; target="_blank">http://forums.techarena.in/software-development/1…</a></a></a&gt;

]]> By: aditya http://microreviews.org/fluidhtml-markup-for-flash/#comment-927 aditya Thu, 17 Sep 2009 13:19:00 +0000 http://microreviews.org/?p=1075#comment-927 You mentioned that fhtml need not be compiled every time like flash, but you also mentioned that fhtml will be using an interpreter, which i suppose is pretty much like a compiler. Correct me if i am wrong. You mentioned that fhtml need not be compiled every time like flash, but you also mentioned that fhtml will be using an interpreter, which i suppose is pretty much like a compiler. Correct me if i am wrong.

]]> By: ArchieIndian http://microreviews.org/fluidhtml-markup-for-flash/#comment-926 ArchieIndian Thu, 17 Sep 2009 13:02:00 +0000 http://microreviews.org/?p=1075#comment-926 @Aditya As I have mentioned in the post They use an interpreter FHTML.SWF. So Compatibility is just not an issue. It is like added functionality which comes in as a component everytime you use FluidHTML for ur page. Even Server side compatibility is not a problem. The only thing i believe should be<br /> <br /> 1 How good it is?<br /> 2 How they get enough developers to work on this?<br /> 3 How good is the FHTML Api which comes out in jan 2010?<br /> 4 Who puts in his money on them. Do they have a good enough business model? They have one which has been described. @Aditya As I have mentioned in the post They use an interpreter FHTML.SWF. So Compatibility is just not an issue. It is like added functionality which comes in as a component everytime you use FluidHTML for ur page. Even Server side compatibility is not a problem. The only thing i believe should be<br />
<br />
1 How good it is?<br />
2 How they get enough developers to work on this?<br />
3 How good is the FHTML Api which comes out in jan 2010?<br />
4 Who puts in his money on them. Do they have a good enough business model? They have one which has been described.

]]> By: aditya http://microreviews.org/fluidhtml-markup-for-flash/#comment-925 aditya Thu, 17 Sep 2009 12:56:00 +0000 http://microreviews.org/?p=1075#comment-925 1. FliudHTML can help usher in HTML 5, but does that mean that FluidHTML will go after HTML 5 comes in?<br /> <br /> 2. How good is the compatibility of FHTML with the present HTML and how well will it be compatible with HTML 5? This comes up because HTML 5 is still in the development phase, and FHTML is out in the market. So, do FHTML developers have enough foresight to take care of this?<br /> <br /> Please enlighten. 1. FliudHTML can help usher in HTML 5, but does that mean that FluidHTML will go after HTML 5 comes in?<br />
<br />
2. How good is the compatibility of FHTML with the present HTML and how well will it be compatible with HTML 5? This comes up because HTML 5 is still in the development phase, and FHTML is out in the market. So, do FHTML developers have enough foresight to take care of this?<br />
<br />
Please enlighten.

]]> By: ArchieIndian http://microreviews.org/fluidhtml-markup-for-flash/#comment-924 ArchieIndian Thu, 17 Sep 2009 12:49:00 +0000 http://microreviews.org/?p=1075#comment-924 @Vikas FluidHTML and HTML 5 are diiferent. People may feel confused. HTML 5 is still at an early stage. HTML5 is expected to be in final draft stage only by 2012.Adoption of this technology will happen only with the final recommendation in 2022(expected). 2022 looks far but I am sure people will make it happen earlier. HTML5 support is there on many browsers now though. Even IE8 is starting to come up the curve. In HTML5 we will have stuff like Canvas(Custom drawing area),Audio and Video without flash, local data storage mechanism will be more efficient, semantic stuff in place of divs and spans like "Header" and "Footer".<br /> <br /> FluidHTML is trying to get in a new standard and it is going to be tough. But if the FluidHTML API, which comes out January 2010, is good then it can help. It can bridge the timegap which is there before HTML5 comes up with something. Also if this comes out really good we may have a better HTML5. @Vikas FluidHTML and HTML 5 are diiferent. People may feel confused. HTML 5 is still at an early stage. HTML5 is expected to be in final draft stage only by 2012.Adoption of this technology will happen only with the final recommendation in 2022(expected). 2022 looks far but I am sure people will make it happen earlier. HTML5 support is there on many browsers now though. Even IE8 is starting to come up the curve. In HTML5 we will have stuff like Canvas(Custom drawing area),Audio and Video without flash, local data storage mechanism will be more efficient, semantic stuff in place of divs and spans like &quot;Header&quot; and &quot;Footer&quot;.<br />
<br />
FluidHTML is trying to get in a new standard and it is going to be tough. But if the FluidHTML API, which comes out January 2010, is good then it can help. It can bridge the timegap which is there before HTML5 comes up with something. Also if this comes out really good we may have a better HTML5.

]]> By: Vikash http://microreviews.org/fluidhtml-markup-for-flash/#comment-923 Vikash Thu, 17 Sep 2009 12:24:00 +0000 http://microreviews.org/?p=1075#comment-923 I wanted to know if its a proprietary thing of FHTML Incs. or is it going to be a part of the standards.. say HTML 5..<br /> I believe for Fhtml to gain wide stage acceptance, they need to get themselves incorporated in the standards..<br /> They simply cannot run a parallel world.. What do you say..?<br /> <br /> Btw, loved the concept. I wanted to know if its a proprietary thing of FHTML Incs. or is it going to be a part of the standards.. say HTML 5..<br />
I believe for Fhtml to gain wide stage acceptance, they need to get themselves incorporated in the standards..<br />
They simply cannot run a parallel world.. What do you say..?<br />
<br />
Btw, loved the concept.

]]> By: ArchieIndian http://microreviews.org/fluidhtml-markup-for-flash/#comment-317 ArchieIndian Thu, 17 Sep 2009 07:57:00 +0000 http://microreviews.org/?p=1075#comment-317 Yes a very basic difference is there . Interpreter will go line by line and atleast show the stuff upto which you are correct. In case of compiler if there is an error, you get an error page and nothing else. I found a good difference at <a href="http://forums.techarena.in/software-development/1120767.htm" rel="nofollow">http://forums.techarena.in/software-development/1120767.htm</a> Yes a very basic difference is there . Interpreter will go line by line and atleast show the stuff upto which you are correct. In case of compiler if there is an error, you get an error page and nothing else.
I found a good difference at http://forums.techarena.in/software-development/1120767.htm

]]> By: aditya http://microreviews.org/fluidhtml-markup-for-flash/#comment-316 aditya Thu, 17 Sep 2009 07:49:28 +0000 http://microreviews.org/?p=1075#comment-316 You mentioned that fhtml need not be compiled every time like flash, but you also mentioned that fhtml will be using an interpreter, which i suppose is pretty much like a compiler. Correct me if i am wrong. You mentioned that fhtml need not be compiled every time like flash, but you also mentioned that fhtml will be using an interpreter, which i suppose is pretty much like a compiler. Correct me if i am wrong.

]]> By: ArchieIndian http://microreviews.org/fluidhtml-markup-for-flash/#comment-315 ArchieIndian Thu, 17 Sep 2009 07:32:48 +0000 http://microreviews.org/?p=1075#comment-315 @Aditya As I have mentioned in the post They use an interpreter FHTML.SWF. So Compatibility is just not an issue. It is like added functionality which comes in as a component everytime you use FluidHTML for ur page. Even Server side compatibility is not a problem. The only thing i believe should be 1 How good it is? 2 How they get enough developers to work on this? 3 How good is the FHTML Api which comes out in jan 2010? 4 Who puts in his money on them. Do they have a good enough business model? They have one which has been described. @Aditya As I have mentioned in the post They use an interpreter FHTML.SWF. So Compatibility is just not an issue. It is like added functionality which comes in as a component everytime you use FluidHTML for ur page. Even Server side compatibility is not a problem. The only thing i believe should be

1 How good it is?
2 How they get enough developers to work on this?
3 How good is the FHTML Api which comes out in jan 2010?
4 Who puts in his money on them. Do they have a good enough business model? They have one which has been described.

]]> By: aditya http://microreviews.org/fluidhtml-markup-for-flash/#comment-314 aditya Thu, 17 Sep 2009 07:26:38 +0000 http://microreviews.org/?p=1075#comment-314 1. FliudHTML can help usher in HTML 5, but does that mean that FluidHTML will go after HTML 5 comes in? 2. How good is the compatibility of FHTML with the present HTML and how well will it be compatible with HTML 5? This comes up because HTML 5 is still in the development phase, and FHTML is out in the market. So, do FHTML developers have enough foresight to take care of this? Please enlighten. 1. FliudHTML can help usher in HTML 5, but does that mean that FluidHTML will go after HTML 5 comes in?

2. How good is the compatibility of FHTML with the present HTML and how well will it be compatible with HTML 5? This comes up because HTML 5 is still in the development phase, and FHTML is out in the market. So, do FHTML developers have enough foresight to take care of this?

Please enlighten.

]]>