A Nobel Cause indeed!

By ArchieIndian | Social Media
16 Oct 2009

Obama

Prologue: It was not just his chiseled “Harvard looks” that stole the show (and the elections of course). Obama  symbolized change. A change that The United States of America was desperately seeking. The first ever black American president candidate epitomized a turn of tide in every possible way. With the country’s economy turning in its grave, nation at war, homes and jobs lost and businesses doomed, Barack Obama symbolized hope and renewal. And this is what his campaign centered around.

“America, this is our moment. This is our time. Our time to turn the page on the policies of the past. Our time to bring new energy and new ideas to the challenges we face. Our time to offer a new direction for the country we love” (Source: Obama’s nomination victory speech in Saint Paul, Minnesota)
It was time indeed. Time for a man to assume the most powerful position in the world. Time to create Brand Obama.
Not only did Obama capture the presidency, but he led his party to sharp gains in Congress. The election ended as one of the most remarkable contests in American political history. That was the 4th Day of November, 2008.

9th Day of October, 2009: Just when we thought that this man couldn’t generate further hype and influence, a piece of news proved many wrong. Barack Obama being declared as the winner of Nobel Prize  for Peace left many gasped in shock! What is even more interesting is that, the Nobel Prize committee sets out February as the deadline for filing of nominations (nobelprize.org). So effectively, a 90 day stay in the White house  is all that the committee had to scrutinize and consider him worthy of such a stupendous honor.
This bears a disturbing resemblance to a swarm of film producers trying to sign star kids up for their movies, the moment they see first rushes of the bloke’s debut film (that has a decent probability of going kaput at the box office mind you!).

The next joke that you’ll probably get to hear on the Late Show with David Letterman  will go as: Obama awarded another Nobel for gifting a pooch to Maria and Sasha!
Isn’t it too early though? Is giving hope to people who are responsible for your victory, enough to fetch you the priceless ($1.4 million worth on second thought) honor? (The money by the way was given to charity, another Nobel in the pipeline for that!!)

Jokes apart however (difficult?? Try…try.), the Nobel committee [quote] recognized Obama’s efforts at dialogue to solve complex global problems, including working toward a world free of nuclear weapons . Only very rarely has a person to the same extent as Obama captured the world’s attention and given its people hope for a better future [unquote].

Oddly enough, the last date of filing of nominations (February if you recall…Or re-read) is also the time when Obama approved of a significant troop increase in Afghanistan! This step was taken in order to [quote] to stabilize a deteriorating situation in Afghanistan  [unquote] (CNN politics.com). Now if that does not bear an uncanny resemblance to Bush ’s statements during US troop  invasion, what will?

The other day I found myself caught in the midst of a heavy discussion centered on Mahatma Gandhi  and his efforts that weren’t considered good enough to earn him a Nobel.

I tried looking up for similar discussions on the internet. The Nobel committee does have an explanation for it. Apparently up to 1960, the Nobel Peace Prize was awarded almost exclusively to Europeans and Americans. Also, Nobel Prize was not given for peaceful settlement of regional conflicts, something that Mahatma Gandhi bought about.  He was, however nominated for the coveted honor in the years 1937, 1938, 1939, 1947 and, finally, a few days before he was murdered in January 1948. Even though the Nobel is never really given posthomously, the Norwegian Nobel Committee did consider his candidature after his death, according to some sources (nobelprize.org).

Nevertheless, the future will see many debates on the decision that the committee has been arriving at.

So while Barack Obama finds a suitable charity to donate his prize money and the citizens of America find some solace in the fact that they’ve elected a “Peace Prize Winner” (Christ!) and that some “change” has indeed arrived, may I call it a post.

No related posts.

Tags: , ,

  • http://topsy.com/tb/bit.ly/2yW77U Tweets that mention A Nobel Cause indeed! | Microreviews.org — Topsy.com

    [...] This post was mentioned on Twitter by Arkid Mitra, Aditya Prakash. Aditya Prakash said: RT @microreviewsorg A Nobel Cause indeed! | Microreviews.org http://bit.ly/2yW77U #nobel #gandhi #obama #peace [...]

  • Arkid Mitra

    Mahatma Gandhi not getting the Nobel hardly mattered to the Mahatma. Yes, the nobel prize would have become worthier, had the Mahatma been awarded the same. As far as Obama getting the Nobel goes, there is one thing that Obama did symbolize, "Hope for the people of the United States". Don't we in India deserve hope too. Is Rahul Gandhi the one? I don't know. But I do hope..

  • http://twitter.com/archieindian Arkid Mitra

    Mahatma Gandhi not getting the Nobel hardly mattered to the Mahatma. Yes, the nobel prize would have become worthier, had the Mahatma been awarded the same.
    As far as Obama getting the Nobel goes, there is one thing that Obama did symbolize, "Hope for the people of the United States". Don't we in India deserve hope too. Is Rahul Gandhi the one? I don't know. But I do hope..

  • Megha Joshi

    I completely buy your point when you say that the Nobel would have been worthier, had Mahatma Gandhi been awarded the same, Arkid. And with the Nobel committee, actually dedicating a web page (<a href="http://nobelprize.org/nobel_prizes/peace/articles/gandhi/index.html)" target="_blank"><a href="http://nobelprize.org/nobel_prizes/peace/articles…</a>" target="_blank">http://nobelprize.org/nobel_prizes/peace/articles…</a></a> trying to give an explanation as to why Mahatma Gandhi wasn't awarded with one, it should consolidate your belief even further. And as far as &quot;hope&quot; goes, I really don't know whether its worthy of such an honor. I would have expected something tangible from the US president to actually confer him with something like this. Also, Rahul Gandhi might just be the one absolutely! I hope the same too. :)

  • Megha Joshi

    I completely buy your point when you say that the Nobel would have been worthier, had Mahatma Gandhi been awarded the same, Arkid. And with the Nobel committee, actually dedicating a web page (http://nobelprize.org/nobel_prizes/peace/articles... trying to give an explanation as to why Mahatma Gandhi wasn't awarded with one, it should consolidate your belief even further.

    And as far as "hope" goes, I really don't know whether its worthy of such an honor. I would have expected something tangible from the US president to actually confer him with something like this.

    Also, Rahul Gandhi might just be the one absolutely! I hope the same too. :)

  • Megha

    I completely buy your point Arkid. The Noble prize would have definitely become worthier had Mahatma Gandhi been awarded with the same. And the committee dedicating a web page reserved for an explanation in the same steam is proof enough. (<a href="http://nobelprize.org/nobel_prizes/peace/articles/gandhi/index.html)" target="_blank"><a href="http://nobelprize.org/nobel_prizes/peace/articles…</a>" target="_blank">http://nobelprize.org/nobel_prizes/peace/articles…</a></a> But I expected something tangible from the US president, to consider him giving my vote for the honor. Hope is too intangible a gift! And for Rahul Gandhi being the one, who knows, may be he is already on his way. I hope the same too :)

  • Megha

    I completely buy your point Arkid. The Noble prize would have definitely become worthier had Mahatma Gandhi been awarded with the same. And the committee dedicating a web page reserved for an explanation in the same steam is proof enough. (http://nobelprize.org/nobel_prizes/peace/articles...

    But I expected something tangible from the US president, to consider him giving my vote for the honor. Hope is too intangible a gift!
    And for Rahul Gandhi being the one, who knows, may be he is already on his way. I hope the same too :)

  • Kumar Tanmay

    Good topic yaar. Well said Arkid. Bapu never wanted peace prize but it would definitely get worthier!

  • Kumar Tanmay

    Good topic yaar. Well said Arkid. Bapu never wanted peace prize but it would definitely get worthier!

  • Kartik

    Looks like a very well researched write-up.This blog sure goes on my RSS feed!!! cheers :D

  • Kartik

    Looks like a very well researched write-up.This blog sure goes on my RSS feed!!! cheers :D

  • Vikash

    Barack Obama does sound/bring/enthuse HOPE..but then I too humm the no &quot;Gimme Hope Jo'ana&quot;.. Shall I ever get a Local Peace Prize even.. NO..!! And why NOT..?? Coz I havent done enuf..not even a lil.. President Obama stands at a similar pedestal wrt the highest Honour in Peace.. This line in the post sums up my take to the closest : &quot;This bears a disturbing resemblance to a swarm of film producers trying to sign star kids..&quot; @Megha : As for the post, very well written..

  • http://twitter.com/viksontweet Vikash

    Barack Obama does sound/bring/enthuse HOPE..but then I too humm the no "Gimme Hope Jo'ana".. Shall I ever get a Local Peace Prize even.. NO..!! And why NOT..?? Coz I havent done enuf..not even a lil..
    President Obama stands at a similar pedestal wrt the highest Honour in Peace..
    This line in the post sums up my take to the closest :
    "This bears a disturbing resemblance to a swarm of film producers trying to sign star kids.."
    @Megha : As for the post, very well written..

blog comments powered by Disqus
More in Social Media (5 of 5 articles)